This blog outlines how data labeling and real-world testing complement each other in the Autonomous Vehicle development lifecycle.
Read MoreSafety Case Analysis for High-Reliability Systems
System safety assessment backed by clear evidence, structured reasoning, and rigorous testing.
Safety Case Analysis Services for Regulated & Mission-Critical Physical AI
DDD helps you build, organize, and maintain safety cases that demonstrate your system is safe, well-tested, and aligned with appropriate standards. We ensure your safety case is evidence-driven, auditable, and ready for internal approval or external certification.
Our Safety Case Analysis Use Cases
Demonstrate safe behavior across ODDs, scenarios, sensor failures, edge cases, and uncertain environments.
- Safety arguments and structured evidence packages
- Hazard identification and misuse analysis
- Scenario-based risk mapping for AVs, drones, AMRs, and industrial robots
- Sensor fusion failure analysis and fallback strategy validation
- Safety case updates for continuous deployment and OTA changes
Document safety and reliability for systems where human life, operational tempo, and mission outcomes depend on predictable behavior.
- Hazard assessments and mission risk evaluations
- Human-machine teaming safety arguments
- Autonomous ISR / UAS safety justification
- Fail-safe and degraded-mode behavior documentation
Map evidence and verification results and broader clinical safety expectations.
- Algorithm change impact assessments
- Bias, robustness, and drift documentation for clinical AI
- Risk control verification and traceability to clinical harms
- Pre-submission safety case support for regulatory filings
Show compliance and interaction safety requirements for human–robot collaboration.
- Workspace hazard mapping and protective measure justification
- Power-and-force limiting analysis for collaborative robots
- Emergency stop, speed, and separation monitoring verification
- Safety evidence for warehouse, factory, and commercial service robots
Support airworthiness and operational safety justification for autonomous and semi-autonomous aviation systems.
- Ground risk and airspace integration assessments
- Failure mode and redundancy argumentation
Ensure safe operation of AI systems embedded in buildings, cities, and industrial sites.
- Safety case development for AI-controlled access, monitoring, or energy systems
- Risk analysis for sensor networks and distributed decision-making
- Evidence for fail-safe transitions and emergency behaviors
Industries We Support
Autonomous Driving
Defensetech
Hazard analysis, risk justification, and mission-safety argumentation for defense systems and autonomous platforms.
Robotics
Safety cases for collaborative robots, mobile robots, and autonomous systems in dynamic environments.
Fully Managed Safety Case Analysis
DDD manages the end-to-end lifecycle:
Define hazards, failure modes, operational design domains, and system boundaries.
Map product requirements to standards.
Perform reviews, scenario risk mapping, and severity-likelihood scoring.
Connect verification and validation results, test logs, telemetry insights, and mitigations into structured safety evidence.
Build safety arguments with claims, subclaims, evidence references, and rationale.
Support internal safety reviews, external assessments, and continuous updates as products evolve.
What Our Clients Say
DDD transformed our fragmented evidence into a clean, defensible safety case that accelerated internal approval.
Their hazard analysis was instrumental in securing a key defense audit.
Our medical device submission went smoother thanks to DDD’s structured safety argumentation.
We now have a repeatable safety-case process for every new release cycle.
Why Choose DDD?
Expert analysts review every hazard, claim, and evidence link for completeness and clarity.
Our teams handle large volumes of test data, hazard logs, and scenario evidence, turning complexity into clarity at scale.
Every claim, hazard, and evidence link is traceable, reviewable, and version-controlled—built for audit and regulatory scrutiny.
We work directly with your safety, validation, and engineering teams, integrating seamlessly into your product lifecycle
Blogs
Read expert articles, insights, and industry benchmarks across physical AI.
Building Digital Twins for Autonomous Vehicles: Architecture, Workflows, and Challenges
In this blog, we will explore how digital twins are transforming the testing and validation of autonomous systems, examine...
Read MoreHow to Conduct Robust ODD Analysis for Autonomous Systems
This blog provides a technical guide to conducting robust ODD analysis for autonomous driving, detailing how to define, structure,...
Read MoreExpert-Led Safety Analysis for Physical AI Systems
Frequently Asked Questions
A safety case is a structured argument that your system is acceptably safe for its intended use, backed by evidence. It is often required for regulatory approvals, customer assurance, or deployment of high-risk systems in the real world.
We work across AI-driven systems, autonomous vehicles, defense and mission-critical platforms, medical device software, industrial robotics, service robots, and other high-reliability technologies.
We connect test results, hazard analyses, mitigations, scenario data, and design documentation into a traceable structure, creating a clear, defensible narrative for regulators and stakeholders.
Every hazard, claim, causal chain, and evidence link is reviewed by trained safety analysts, ensuring contextual understanding and rigor that automated tools alone cannot provide.
Yes. We support continuous updates as your system evolves, new scenarios, new software versions, additional mitigations, or updated risk assessments.
Our global evaluation and safety teams scale from small expert reviews to large, complex, multi-system safety case builds, depending on your product lifecycle and regulatory needs.